
This month we examine “Fran,” one of our benchmark workouts. The opportunity this affords for insights into human performance, programming, and ways of measuring and motivating progress is strong.
First and foremost, Fran is a couplet of barbell thrusters (front squat/push-press combo) and pull-ups. More specifically, her structure is 21 thrusters followed by 21 pull-ups, then 15 thrusters followed by 15 pull-ups, and, finally, 9 thrusters followed by 9 pull-ups. We score the workout by time to completion. Our notation for this, and other similar workouts is, “Three rounds, 21-15- and 9 reps, for time, of 95-pound barbell thrusters and pull-ups.”
First exposure to this workout reveals Fran’s penchant for throwing a beating. Repeated exposures, where the goal is improved time, demonstrate a ferocity that speaks to the painful cost of elite fitness. Considering the thruster’s position as the most draining of all exercises and the pull-up’s reputation for winnowing athlete pools, there may be little surprise in Fran’s effects.
Coupled, the thruster and the pullup work all major muscle groups, are perfectly complementary in that each contains exactly what the other lacks, and constitute three superfunctional core movements-the squat, push press, and pull-up. But a closer analysis offers even greater appreciation and understanding of Fran’s character.

3 Comments on “Fooling Around With Fran”
1
wrote …
I was just recently introduced to the benchmark girls and "Fran" was my first. WOW! I have never hurt like that before.
Login to reply to this comment
Permalink
2
wrote …
What happened to articles like this? I love CrossFit, I miss reading real thought and inginuity like this. There is just not enough thought like this in the forums to make them worth the time, and the journal seems to have shifted from about 2005 and 2006 away from articles like this. What can we do about this, it seems like a shame? There are those that just want to do the WOD and not worry about the structure, nothing wrong with that, but there are those of us that like to think about these things.
Login to reply to this comment
Permalink
3
wrote …
"foot-pound" and "foot-pound/second" are pretty funny units, as a Physicist student, I would have never thought anyone would ever think about using these kind of units... silly US -_-'
Login to reply to this comment
Permalink
Leave a comment